for x holds P[x] & Q[x]
proof
let x;
......
......
thus P[x];
......
......
thus Q[x]; (thesis)
end;
for x,y st P[x,y] holds Q[x,y]
proof
let x,y;
assume P[x,y];
......
......
thus Q[x,y]; (thesis)
end;
for x,y st P[x,y] holds Q[x,y]
proof
let x,y such that L:P[x,y];
......
......
......
thus Q[x,y];
end;
for x,y st P[x,y] & Q[x,y] holds R[x,y]
proof
let x,y such that L1:P[x,y] and L2:Q[x,y];
......
......
thus R[x,y];
end;
let x,y such that L1:P[x,y] and L2:Q[x,y];
is
let x,y such that L:P[x,y] & Q[x,y];
We can also write like the above. Methods for writing the front and back are basically the same. In the method for writing the front, and is used for dividing into two sentences to build other labels. This means that one sentence A & B was divided into sentences A and B. On the other hand, the method for writing the back is persistently one sentence and it is connected by a logical calculation unit. As stated before, we can divide one sentence into two by using and, or, we can connect two sentences into one by using &.
for x,y st P[x,y] & S[x,y] holds Q[x,y]
proof
let x,y;
assume P[x,y] & S[x,y];
......
......
thus Q[x,y];
end;
assume P[x,y] & S[x,y];
can be written as below.
assume that L1:P[x,y] and L2:S[x,y];
Only with the way of writing the above formula, we can write labels on both P[x,y] and S[x,y]. In this example, they are L1 and L2 labels.
assume that A and B;
then C;
Therefore, the above method of writing is not possible. We have to use labels and write in the following way.
assume that L1:A and L2:B;
C by L1,L2;
Or, when only B is used, we can only write as below:
C by L2;
Also, when there is only one citation, then cannot be used. We have to write by using L2 instead of then. Therefore, when that is stated, labels have to be there or this sentence can not be used. In short, this will not be able to be cited later. Thus, we have to think that there labels will always follow that.
assume P[x,y] & Q[x,y], in this case, the following can be used.
assume P[x,y] & Q[x,y];
then ......
Thus, there is only one sentence without that. For assume, then is used.